British   American      Alpine		French 
Characteristics                         Numerical Yosemite      UIAA		System
Easy( Like a  vertical stone stair)               1,2     	I      	       I	
Some difficult(Same but  Bad stair)     1a,b,c    3  	        II,III-,III	II
Difficult (without some steps)          2,a,b     5.1, 5.2	III+		III
Very difficult ( no steps identified)   2c, 3a    5.3, 5.4	IV,IV+	  	IV, IV+
Severe  ( Some technique required)      3b, 4a    5.5, 5.6	V-,V		V
Very severe ( Technique required)       4b, 4c    5.7, 5.8 	V+,VI-	  	V+
Hardly severe                           5a, 5b    5.9, 5.10a,b	VI, VI+	  	6a, 6a+
Very hardly (Beginner Sport climbers)   5c,       5.10 to 5.11    VII-, VII	6b, 6b+	
Extremely severe (Sport climbers)       6a  	  5.11a		VII+, VIII-	6c, 6c+
Hard extremely severe (Sport climbers)  6a,6b     5.12a,5.12b	VIII,VIII+	7a, 7a+ 
Incredibly hard to do it !              6b, 6c	  5.12c	         IX-, IX	7b, 7c
Unbelievable to do it !                 6c, 7a 	  5.13a, 5.13b	IX+		7c, 8a
There are other systems as the numerical Australian and the American NCCS.
In Portugal Spain and Italy we use the French system which is becoming slowly the international standard with Roman numbering until level V+ . In some places in Portugal we can see the signal "-" (minus) which is not properly the French system but it represents a small reference detail to the next level.
Opinion between climbers about routes is sometimes frequent but, the discussions are about small differences like between 6a or 6b. Generally the big level differences are agreed.
The numerical grades take account of technical difficulty and are usually based on hard movements to do. Levels are also related with loose rock, dangerous fall and so.

Explanation of the A1 to A5 grading system for aid- climbing pitches by John Middendorf

Climbing sections of rock which are impassable free, yet accept gear to allow progress, is considered aid climbing. Of most importance, aid climbing allows climbers to ascend the long awesome rock walls, faces otherwise unclimbable, located around the world in wild places. Special techniques, skills, and equipment are required. Aid climbing, though more cumbersome and complex than free climbing, is an essential technique for a climber's ability to climb, to ascend the vertical and overhanging.
The scope of this article is to define the A1 to A5 system of grading individual aid pitches.
First a note on the overall grading system of a particular big-wall climb. A climb rated Grade VI, 5.10, A4, for example, indicates the length (the grade VI indicates over a two day climb), the maximum free difficulty (5.10), and the hardest aid pitch (A4). The overall grading system never tells the true story, however. The same Grade VI, 5.10, A4 rating could apply to a 8 pitch, three-day route with merely one pitch of A4, and a short, well-protected section of 5.10. Or it could represent the difficulty of a horrendous, 30 pitch, 10 day nailup, with multiple horror show A4 pitches, and bold unprotected pitches of 5.10. Big-wall climbing is such, however, that the general difficulty of a route becomes apparent in plain sight, and the intimidation which one feels when looking up at a massive chunk of stone roughly proportionates to the effort and skill that will be required to attempt climbing it.


Also known as "french-free", using gear to make progress, but generally no aiders required.
Examples: Half Dome regular route, sections of the Nose route on El Cap, the first two pitches of the West Face (either a quick 5.10, A0 with three points of aid, or tricky 5.11 c).

Easy aid: placements straightforward and solid. No risk of any piece pulling out. Aiders generally required. Fast and simple for C1, the hammerless corresponding grade, but not necessarily fast and simple for nailing pitches.
Examples: (clean) the non-5.12 version of the Salathe headwall, Prodigal Son on Angel's Landing and Touchstone Wall in Zion.

Moderate aid: placements generally solid but possible awkward and strenuous to place. Maybe a tenuous placement or two above good pro with no fall-danger.
Examples: the Right side of El Cap Tower (nailing), Moonlight Buttress and Space Shot in Zion (clean).

Like A2, but possibly several tenuous placements above good pro. 20 to 30 foot fall potential but with little danger of hitting anything. Route finding abilities may be required.
Examples: the new wave grades of Mescalito and the Shield on El Cap, the Kor route on the Titan in the Fisher Towers area.

Hard aid: testing methods required. Involves many tenuous placements in a row. Generally solid placements (which could hold a fall) found within a pitch. Long fall potential up to 50 feet (6-8 placements ripping), but generally safe from serious danger. Usually several hours required to complete a pitch, due to complexity of placements.
Examples: The Pacific Ocean Wall lower crux pitches (30 feet between original bolts on manky fixed copperheads), Standing Rock in the desert (the crux being a traverse on the first pitch with very marginal gear with 30 foot swing potential into a corner).

Like A3, but with dangerous fall potential. Tenuous placements (like a marginal tied-off pin or a hook an a fractured edge) after long stretches of body-weight pieces (here body-weight placements are considered for all practical purposes any piece of gear not solid enough to hold a fall). Potential to get hurt if good judgement is not exercised.
Time required generally exceeds 3 hours for experienced aid climbers.
Example: Pitch 3 of "Days of No Future" on Angel's Landing in Zion, the crux being 50 feet of birdbeaks and tied-off blades in soft sandstone followed by a blind, marginal Friend placement in loose rock which was hard to test properly, all this above a ledge.

Serious aid: lots of danger. 60 to 100 foot fall potentials common, with uncertain landings far below.
Examples: pitches on the Kaliyuga on Half Dome and the Radiator on Abraham in Zion.

More serious than A4. these leads generally take many hours to complete and require the climber to endure long periods of uncertainty and fear, often requiring a ballet-like efficiency of movement in order not to upset the tenuous integrity of marginal placements.
Examples: the "Welcome to Wyoming" pitch (formerly the"Psycho Killer" pitch) on the Wyoming Sheep Ranch on El Cap, requiring 50 feet of climbing through a loose, broken, and rotten Diorite roof with very marginal, scary placements like stoppers wedged in between two loose, shifting, rope-slicing slivers of rock, all this over a big jagged loose ledge which would surely break and maim bones.
The pitch is then followed by 100 feet of hooking interspersed with a few rivets to the belay.

Extreme aid. Nothing really trustworthy of catching a fall for the entire pitch. Rating should be reserved only for pitches with no bolts or rivets (holes) for the entire pitch.
Examples: pitches on the Jolly Roger and the Wyoming Sheep Ranch on El Cap, Jim Beyer routes in Arches National Park and the Fisher Towers.

(Theoretical grade) A5 climbing with marginal belays which will not hold a fall.

| Home | |Personal remarks | | Tips for beginners | | Map of Portugal with climbing sites | | Links |